The Trump administration's decision to withdraw federal approval for New York City's congestion pricing program has ignited a fierce debate. The program, which imposes a toll on vehicles entering Manhattan's central business district, was intended to alleviate traffic and fund improvements for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). President Trump celebrated the move, declaring the program "dead" and likening himself to royalty. "LONG LIVE THE KING!" he wrote on social media, emphasizing the administration's stance that the tolls unfairly burden motorists from outside the city[1].

Governor Kathy Hochul responded defiantly to the Trump administration's decision, vowing to keep the congestion pricing program operational. She emphasized the program's importance for New Yorkers, particularly in reducing pollution and funding public transit. "We are keeping the cameras on. Lights, cameras, action. They're staying on," Hochul declared, highlighting the state's readiness to fight the federal decision in court[1]. The governor criticized the administration's reasoning, particularly the influence of New Jersey's opposition, questioning why another state's preferences should dictate New York's policies[2].

The termination of New York's congestion pricing program has elicited mixed reactions across the Tri-State area. In New Jersey, leaders like Governor Phil Murphy expressed relief, viewing the program as a financial burden on commuters. "New Jersey residents - come, you're welcomed, but you're not forced to come here," Murphy stated, emphasizing the perceived economic motivations behind the toll[2]. Meanwhile, some New Yorkers argue the program has successfully reduced traffic and improved air quality, with the Environmental Defense Fund noting its positive impact on public transit and environmental health[3].