After more than 24 hours of deliberation over five days, the jury reached a verdict, acquitting Penny of criminally negligent homicide. The case began when Penny restrained Neely, who was experiencing a mental health crisis, using a chokehold that lasted nearly six minutes, ultimately leading to Neely's death. The defense argued that Penny acted in self-defense and out of a necessity to protect himself and other passengers, while the prosecution portrayed the act as excessive and unjustified. This acquittal comes after a dismissal of a more serious manslaughter charge due to the jury's deadlock.

The verdict has led to mixed reactions, with significant public outcry and protests. Supporters of Neely have expressed disappointment and outrage, fearing that the verdict sets a dangerous precedent. Protests and vigils calling for justice for Jordan Neely and criticizing the decision as an endorsement of civilian vigilantism were held outside the courthouse. On the other hand, Penny's supporters argue that the jury's decision affirms the right of individuals to protect themselves and others in dangerous situations.

This case has underscored the critical issues of mental health and racial justice in America. The NAACP and other civil rights organizations have condemned the verdict, highlighting the challenges Black Americans face, particularly in mental health crises. The case has reignited discussions on how law enforcement and civilians respond to such crises and the racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Advocates for mental health and racial equity are calling for systemic reforms to prevent similar incidents in the future.