Freddie Owens faced extensive legal battles leading up to his execution. His lawyers made several appeals citing new evidence and procedural concerns, which were ultimately dismissed by higher courts, including a decisive rejection by the U.S. Supreme Court. In his final moments, Owens was administered a lethal dose of pentobarbital, a method recently adopted by South Carolina. Despite the somber setting, there were no final statements; however, he did communicate silently with his attorney, who had chosen the method of his execution.

The execution of Freddie Owens drew significant public attention, with protests occurring outside the prison and vigils held by various groups opposing the death penalty. Advocates argued that the death penalty is an inhumane form of punishment and highlighted the racial and ethical disparities in its application. Emotional scenes unfolded as demonstrators, some in tears, gathered to voice their opposition, underscoring the deep divisions and ongoing debate surrounding capital punishment in America.

Freddie Owens' case was marred by controversies, including a last-minute recantation by a co-defendant who initially testified against him. This affidavit claimed Owens was not present at the crime scene, contradicting earlier testimonies. Despite these claims, the courts found the new evidence inconsistent with previous statements, and the execution proceeded. This case has reignited discussions on the reliability of witness testimonies and the ethical implications of the death penalty.